Investigating capital flight in South Asian countries: The dual influence of terrorism and corruption

This specific research initiative aims to intricately examine the intricate dynamics connecting terrorism, corruption, and capital flight within the context of South Asian economies, encompassing countries including Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. The principal objectives of this study entail a comprehensive investigation into the synergistic impacts of terrorism and corruption on the prevalence of capital flight. To realize these objectives, the study employs longitudinal data from 1990 to 2019, adopting the portfolio choice framework as its theoretical underpinning. In terms of methodology, the empirical inquiry uses the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimation technique. The empirical findings derived from this analysis distinctly establish a statistically noteworthy and positive correlation between terrorism, corruption, and the occurrence of capital flight across multiple South Asian nations. In light of these discerning outcomes, it is strongly recommended that the governments of South Asian countries prioritize and actively pursue the fortification of their institutional governance mechanisms. This strategic approach is deemed crucial in efficaciously counteracting the escalation of capital flight. Specifically, a targeted focus on augmenting institutional governance practices, fostering transparency, fortifying anti-corruption measures, and intensifying counterterrorism efforts could collectively contribute to reducing capital flight tendencies. By undertaking these recommendations, South Asian governments can foster an environment of enhanced economic stability, attractiveness for investment, and sustainable growth, thereby deterring the adverse impact of capital flight while concurrently combatting the underlying challenges posed by terrorism and corruption.


Introduction
Over the past thirty years, global policymakers and researchers have increasingly expressed concern regarding capital flight to and from underdeveloped countries, citing its potential to support acts of terrorism and corruption [1][2][3].This concern arises within the intricate landscape encompassing the economies, societies, and international relations of developing nations like South Asian countries, where the interplay of terrorism and corruption has led to substantial transformative effects [4].As South Asian countries diligently seek financial resources to advance their growth and developmental agendas, the convergence of global terrorism and corruption has notably facilitated the outflow of capital from these regions to other destinations.In today's interconnected global landscape, reminiscent of a closely-knit community, foreign investment has assumed paramount importance in ensuring the resilience and prosperity of sovereign entities.This relationship between terrorism and investment exerts a dual impact, as it diminishes foreign investment and prompts domestic investors to exit capital markets.The interconnected nature of these challenges becomes more apparent when we consider the broader implications of global terrorism, corruption and their impact on capital movements.
Capital flight is distinguished as an atypical outflow of capital founded on discernible doubt and uncertainty regarding future economic prospects, as asserted by [5].Correspondingly, capital flight can also be acknowledged as an approach to hedge against macroeconomic risks and shocks utilizing portfolio divergence, as posited by [6][7][8].The repercussions of terrorism and corruption extend beyond geographical boundaries, influencing the countries directly affected and resonating at an international level.Efforts to counteract these challenges contribute to individual nations' stability and encourage the global security framework [9].In this context, creating a conducive environment for foreign investment is essential for respective countries and contributes to a more stable and secure global economic landscape [7,10].
According to the scholarly work of [11], terrorism is characterized as a deliberate and systematic threat instigated by subnational groups to attain a political or ethical aim through coercion directed towards a large audience.There exists a plethora of terrorism types that are practiced globally, namely domestic terrorism, international terrorism, and unspecified terrorism.Domestic terrorism is defined as terrorism acts that are directed towards victims of the same nationality as the attackers, whereas transnational terrorism is defined as terrorism acts committed by foreigners.Terrorist actions correlate with capital outflow due to their shared characteristic of causing economic uncertainty.Countries facing significant levels of terrorism become less appealing to foreign investors and multinational corporations, leading to a reduced inflow of FDI [12].As pointed out by [13], acts of terrorism play a pivotal role in diminishing a nation's capital resources.
Consequently, domestic investors also opt to relocate their investments, seeking not only higher returns but also a way to lessen the risk associated with holding assets in countries targeted by terrorists [14].Moreover, this decreased foreign investment, in turn, can lead to reduced economic growth and opportunities, contributing to capital flight as both local and foreign investors seek more stable and secure markets [10].As acts of terrorism create an atmosphere of instability and insecurity, they can weaken governance structures, thereby fostering an environment conducive to corrupt practices.In regions afflicted by frequent terrorist activities, unscrupulous individuals might exploit the chaos to their advantage, diverting resources and public funds for personal gain.This corrupt behavior erodes public trust and hinders economic development and investment [15].This situation encourages individuals to conceal their assets to evade taxes and transfer funds to other countries, thus contributing to white-collar crimes commonly known as corruption.
According to [16], corruption is the primary source of macroeconomic instability and underdevelopment in nations.A noteworthy transfer of unlawful capital outflow is conducted by individuals in positions of power through the mode mentioned earlier of transaction.An unstable and corrupt leadership also engenders economic circumstances that incentivize the flight of capital and deter foreign investment in underdeveloped nations.As per Lee and Rishi's research in 2008, corruption poses a risk to buy as it dissuades anticipated investment from foreign entities.Corruption stands as the primary cause of macroeconomic vulnerability and inadequate development.The ramifications of capital migration from less affluent countries, particularly South Asian ones, are of great concern.It is important to note that these countries are not exempt from this undesirable trend.Ironically, these South Asian countries urgently need funding for projects with high returns, diverting their limited resources to wealthy nations with uncertain returns, resulting in what is known as the Lucas paradox [17], as cited by [18].[19] present empirical proof for the indigenous and external constituents of the macroeconomic underpinnings propelling the phenomenon of capital flight.The domestic factors they identified encompassed economic development, inflation, capital susceptibility, currency devaluation, financial insecurity, and domestic taxation rates.Conversely, they ascertained that a heightened degree of international economic amalgamation was a significant external instigator of the surging capital flight from emerging economies.Additionally, prior studies have identified factors, such as political calamities and civil and military ambiguity, as principal causes of capital flight (refer to [20][21][22].The identified variables responsible for capital flight in emerging nations are institutional quality, as noted by [4,23].Despite the considerable detrimental impact of capital flight on the economy, as highlighted by [24], there is a shortage of country-specific studies examining the macroeconomic fundamentals that lead to capital flight in South Asian economies.It is imperative to observe that none of the above-mentioned investigations have taken into account the potential ramifications of terrorism and corruption on capital flows within the context of South Asian economies, specifically encompassing India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka.The majority of nations within this geographical area are identified as focal points of terrorism and havens for corruption.
To the best of our understanding, this study takes the pioneering step of examining the critical intersection of terrorism [25] and corruption [26] with capital flight, not only within South Asian countries but also on a global scale.It becomes evident that earlier studies have overlooked the examination of how these two factors separately could affect capital flight.Therefore, our present study is motivated by the existing gap in research that connects capital flight with terrorism and corruption.Prior works by [27][28][29] explored the underlying reasons behind capital flight, including economic openness, growth, currency rate depreciation, and political instability.Although the inquiries mentioned above have significantly contributed to our comprehension of the dynamics, the primary data they provide is inconclusive and conflicting.The current study contributes by presenting a more focused examination of terrorism and corruption, which have been neglected in the context of capital flight, rectifying the lack of clarity observed in earlier research.This research extends its preview beyond South Asian countries, offering a broader, global context.It recognizes that geographic boundaries do not confine terrorism and corruption and can have implications far beyond their region of origin.By taking this global perspective, the study provides relevant insights to South Asia and countries facing similar challenges worldwide.
Furthermore, the study equips policymakers with essential resources to tackle the diverse internal and external factors influencing capital flight.Offering a deeper understanding of the consequences of terrorism and corruption, it assists in formulating effective strategies to mitigate capital flight's adverse effects on economic stability, national security, and sustainable development.The study has implications for international relations, delving into terrorism and corruption that often transcend national borders.Understanding how these global issues affect capital flight can inform diplomatic efforts and international cooperation in addressing these common challenges.By unraveling the linkages between terrorism, corruption, and capital flight, the research promotes economic resilience and investment attractiveness.
Policymakers can use this information to create an environment conducive to capital inflow, fostering economic growth and development.The subsequent sections of this study are structured as follows.Section two encompasses an in-depth exploration of the existing literaturesection three delves into elaborating the model, methodology, and data employed.Empirical findings are unveiled in section four, providing a comprehensive analysis.Finally, section five encompasses a synthesis of the conclusions drawn and the implications for policy considerations.

Effect of terrorism on capital flight
Terrorism has demonstrated a notable influence on capital flight across diverse global regions.Scholarly investigations have revealed that acts of terrorism can exert an adverse impact on investor sentiment, subsequently precipitating capital outflows [30].This correlation between terrorism and capital flight has been meticulously explored within African nations, revealing a particularly pronounced detrimental effect on industrialization, notably heightened in developing countries [31][32][33].Similarly, in the context of Asian countries, instances of terrorist attacks have been established as contributing to an escalation in capital flight; however, the amplification of this impact can be mitigated through strategic military expenditures [34,35].
Furthermore, inquiries into the repercussions of terrorism on capital flight have extended to encompass regions such as Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa (MENA), where both domestic and transnational forms of terrorism have exhibited a significant association with capital flight [1].Collectively, these comprehensive investigations underscore the intrinsic link between terrorism and capital flight, thereby underscoring the imperative for policymakers to address the multifaceted economic implications of terrorism and proactively foster a climate of investor confidence [36].
The term "terrorism" in this study refers to the strategic utilization of violence by subnational groups to achieve political, religious, or ideological goals by intimidating a broad audience [7,37].It is plausible that a correlation exists between terrorism and capital flight, attributed to the economic uncertainty it generates.This uncertainty might lead investors to retract their investments from the impacted economy.This proposition finds reinforcement in a wealth of documented evidence, indicating that investors are typically in favorable economic environments characterized by reduced ambiguity [38][39][40].Engaging in acts of terrorism inherently carries a significant risk of inflicting financial harm, which, subsequently, can lead to adverse repercussions for the value of assets held by investors.This scenario can potentially trigger a loss of market confidence due to unfavorable economic circumstances.Thus, in contexts where terrorism prevails within a specific country, there is a considerable likelihood of increased capital and valuable asset outflows from that nation.It's essential to recognize the strong linkage between terrorism and the decline in foreign investment [7].
In the context of political access theories, terrorism is inherently linked with violence and political upheaval, contrary to the perspective put forth by [41], which suggests an association with less violence and stability.The correlation between terrorism and capital flight becomes more comprehensible by examining how acts of violence impact the cross-border movement of financial resources.Political instability and violence can establish a connection between conflicts and uncertainty concerning future investment yields, which could result in a reduction of capital transfer between nations.
As [42] points out, investors within an economy might feel compelled to move their funds and investments to other countries to secure returns on their assets.Examining terrorism's dynamics is essential for comprehending the tactics of subnational entities that employ force to achieve political aims.This is consistent with the theoretical prioritization of political instability and aggression, underscoring the significance of acknowledging the societal and investment ramifications associated with terrorism.It is crucial to emphasize that terrorism primarily targets innocent civilians to pressure governments, further solidifying the terrorisminvestment nexus.The theoretical construct is reinforced by the delineation and essence of capital flight, which pertains to relocating financial assets from one nation to another for economic value preservation.This framework furnishes a holistic comprehension of the intricate interplay between terrorism and investments.
The literature based on empirical observations regarding the factors contributing to capital flight has extensively covered investment hazards and profits.These perils include currency devaluation, financial instability, and domestic tax rates.Scholars have also researched political and governance attributes and economic structural aspects like reliance on natural resources.Notably, the political environment significantly shapes capital flight, as it can result in asset loss or damage and lead to heightened insurance premiums for investments.Several studies, including [43][44][45][46], have highlighted investment risks as a critical determinant influencing whether investors redirect their resources to different nations.However, it is pivotal to maintain a constructive and supportive approach, given that investors are inclined to consider countries with lower investment risks coupled with effective anti-terrorism measures.

Effect of corruption on capital flight
The complex interweaving of the concept of corruption with ideological, moral, cultural, and political dimensions gives rise to various perspectives.Acknowledging the widespread global corruption issue, often underestimated despite its harmful and exploitative presence alongside numerous political entities and their populations worldwide, is crucial.This leads to far-reaching consequences spanning various industries, prompting the necessity for relentless efforts in its prevention.The term "corruption" encapsulates diverse behaviors, ranging from minor bribery to more significant cases of grand corruption, insider trading within the business sector, and misallocation of public funds.However, we can find reassurance that multiple scholars, including [47][48][49][50], have comprehensively examined this intricate phenomenon.Their research can serve as a guiding beacon in our collective endeavor to combat corruption.
The works of [32,40,[51][52][53][54][55] have substantially contributed to the literature on corruption.It is important to note that earlier literature frequently defined corruption as the "misuse of public office for private ends or personal gain" [56][57][58].We acknowledge the careful approach taken to distinguish the term "corruption" from "bribery," particularly in the context of global initiatives like the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Antibribery Convention and C.E., which emphasize international business practices.In our pursuit of combating corruption and fostering transparency and accountability, it remains crucial to continue exploring and defining the concept of corruption.We recognize the significance of these efforts and firmly believe they play a vital role in shaping a more just and equitable world.
Esteemed scholars have devoted immense endeavors to discourse on corruption, recognizing it as a multifaceted phenomenon that transcends mere political tactics aimed at obtaining or retaining power or transparent economic transactions propelled by monetary incentives.The term "corruption" remains open to discussion due to its disruptive impact on the essential components of a nation-state and its corrosive effect on the societal, political, and economic fabric, encompassing public, private, and personal domains.We appreciate the diverse academics who have examined this issue, such as [51,[59][60][61], that corruption is not a clearly defined, distinct entity that can be effortlessly identified and eradicated.We must persevere in our attentive investigation of this complex subject, as each endeavor towards comprehending and eliminating corruption represents a stride towards generating a superior world for all.
In 2014, Delgado and his colleagues undertook an exploratory mission that delved into the intricacies of foreign investment and its subsequent effects on growth.This study took into account the impact of corruption.To achieve their objective, they utilized a generalized growth framework to scrutinize the variability within the correlation among growth, FDI, and corruption.Using OLS estimation, the researchers analyzed a panel of non-OECD nations from 1985 to 2002.The empirical evidence confirmed a positive and significant association between foreign investment and development.Unfortunately, the study revealed that the considerable returns on FDI had become a notable source of corruption, thereby curbing the pace of economic advancement in many developing nations.Nonetheless, the researchers discovered that reducing crime could positively impact developing countries with low returns on FDI [62].
[63] conducted an analysis examining institutional, economic, and political factors alongside the scale of capital leaving Ethiopia.Their study covered the period from 1970 to 2012 and utilized error correction techniques for estimation.The empirical findings they derived underscore that the primary drivers of capital flight encompass macroeconomic instability, currency devaluation, interest rate disparities, and corruption.Additionally, political turmoil has emerged as a noteworthy contributor to capital flight.The study observes that capital outflows surged preceding periods of violent regime changes, although they somewhat diminished following the consolidation of governmental authority.Nonetheless, recent trends indicate a renewed increase in capital outflows.[28,64] conducted an extensive analysis to assess supremacy's influence on the movement of capital.The research utilized information from 37 African nations, spanning the period from 1996 to 2010, and employed the GMM methodology.The evaluation of political governance encompassed variables like political stability, participatory mechanisms, and answerability.In contrast, organizational management was appraised using government efficiency, educational quality, and adherence to the rule of law.The empirical findings of the study revealed that political influence, answerability, and participatory mechanisms exhibited a noteworthy adverse impact on capital migration.Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that other factors displayed marginal effects in contrast to the heightened capital flight resulting from economic governance.
A significant body of scholarly work has illustrated the noteworthy impact that terrorism and corruption can wield over capital flight.However, it is essential to acknowledge that in developed countries, these variables do not possess as potent an influence compared to their effect in developing nations.The presence of terrorism and corruption introduces heightened uncertainty for investors regarding potential returns on their assets within the country, prompting them to seek investment opportunities elsewhere.Unfortunately, the questionable macroeconomic environment resulting from terrorism and corruption ultimately leads to a deterioration in the nation's economic standing, thereby magnifying the susceptibility to capital flight.While prior investigations have analyzed factors such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), interest rates, exchange rates, external debt, and trade openness, there is a lack of extensive research on the impact of terrorism and corruption on capital flight, particularly within the South Asian region.Consequently, it is crucial to tackle the issue of capital flight and thoroughly examine the potential influence exercised by terrorism and corruption.

Model, data and methodology
This section is a significant addition to the field of economics, as it offers a comprehensive exploration of theoretical and econometric models.The section has a highly organized structure, with individual sections dedicated to distinct facets of the models.The initial section provides an exact definition of the theoretical model, followed by an intricate dissection of the econometric model in the subsequent section.Moving forward, the third section imparts a comprehensive elucidation of the employed technique, while the fourth section thoroughly scrutinizes the variables' associated data.The section imparts a wealth of information through the presentation of pertinent data and a meticulous explication of the variables, including diagnostic analysis, econometric inference methodologies, and an empirical model for estimations.[14], in collaboration with [65], a Portfolio Choice framework aimed at asset allocation was introduced.The primary goal of this framework is to analyze the impact of corruption and terrorism on capital outflows.Consider a hypothetical situation where a notable cluster of agents resides within an economically disadvantaged country.Over a specified period, both domestic and foreign investors yield returns from their investments.For consistency, identical investments have been made in both countries.Labor income has been omitted, and the population remains constant to ensure precision.The production of an identical commodity takes place in both nations.Assuming that "a t " signifies the resources utilized in the host country's market at time "t" to generate a return of "r t ," investments in the host country's market are exposed to a risk denoted as "r � Nðm; s 2 Þ".

Theoretical model
Considering the widely accepted idea that the fledgling financial market of the host nation is still in its early stages of development, achieving risk-free returns appears to be an improbable scenario.Nevertheless, singling out distinct endeavors in the foreign country as "a f t " might lead to a reliable and consistent rate of return r f .Solving this dilemma would significantly enhance the long-term welfare of the population.
The Portfolio Choice model shown here is an excellent example of being simple.It uses the easiest way to figure out the best way to divide things without making it complicated or confusing.
The Portfolio Choice model shown here is an excellent example of being simple.It uses the easiest way to figure out the best way to divide things without making it complicated or confusing.
The most important thing we're looking at in our study is something called the "coefficient of risk aversion," which we represent as y � À E½U 00 ðc tþ1 Þ�=E½U 0 ðc tþ1 Þ�.Also, we're talking about how much the return on investments in our country can change, which we call VARðr tþ1 Þ.People who live in other places and send their money to the least developed countries we're talking about in our model also face a similar challenge.In one of our equations, we're adding up the money going out of the country, a f * tþ1 , and the money coming into our country illegally, as a f 0 tþ1 .In the least developed country, we show the total money going out as A f tþ1 � a f * tþ1 .So, we can't determine the total amount of money invested in our country from t to t + 1.
Eq 3.4 demonstrates how a balance is reached between assets within the country and investments from abroad, and this balance depends on both the characteristics of the host country market and the foreign market.We can find the formula for balancing capital leaving the country by rearranging Eq (3.4) and substituting local investment.a * tþ1 With the values from Eq (3.3).
Eq 3.5 suggests that when capital flight in the country increases, the expected returns within the country decrease.This happens because people are very cautious about risks, which leads to more significant uncertainty in local investments.At the time "t," we change Eq (3.5) by dividing both sides equally by Kt, showing capital leaving as a part of the total physical capital stock.
Eq 3.6 shows that sending money out of the country is more advantageous when the expected return on investments within the government is not very good, there's a lot of risk with local assets, and the overall level of danger is high.

Data
This study examines a group of South Asian countries, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, utilizing four primary sources of information.These sources include details about money leaving the country from [31] research, other economic control variables gathered from the World Bank's World Development Indicators and International Financial Statistics, and corruption indicators evaluated through the Corruption Perception Index and detailed description of variables in Table 1.The study's time frame was chosen based on available data, with 2019 as the final year for capital flight data.The data is divided into separate three-year periods that do not overlap.To avoid too many factors or issues, the assessment method follows the generalized process of moments (GMM) approach, which uses data averages.The study encompasses five separate three-year periods without overlap, spanning from 1990 to 2019.
The capital flight indicator helps uncover the movement of unreported money between a country and other nations.This indicator clarifies the changing result of the increase in capital movements from foreign money entering a country's balance of payments.The increase in these movements can be linked to "net errors and omissions," which points to the lack of funds, meaning the difference between recorded inflows and outflows.Using the capital flight measurement encounters a notable difficulty, explicitly presenting the measure in steady 2010 U.S. dollars, complicating comparisons with other factors.According to a study by [66], this challenge can be overcome by first converting the current GDP into consistent 2010 terms.This is followed by generating a "GDP constant of 2010 USD (in millions)" by multiplying the figure by 1,000,000.Finally, the capital flight data is reproduced by this "GDP constant of 2010 USD (in millions)."This transformation yields a capital flight measurement that can be assessed alongside other chosen factors regarding averages and standard deviations.The study uses four key terrorism indicators, which include domestic, transnational, unclear, and overall terrorism.For consistency, the specific definitions of terrorism from [14] were adopted, and data was taken from the global terrorism index.
Using the corruption index, offers a reliable method for testing further strength in the analysis.To account for any potential missing factors that could affect the results, the study considers various aspects such as GDP growth, external debt, interest rate, trade openness, and currency rate.Much research on capital flight [1,30,67,68] has provided substantial information about the selected control variables.Detailed explanations of variables and their data sources are given in the table.

Methodology
Using the generalized method of moments as the empirical approach was motivated by five key reasons.The initial two reasons are crucial prerequisites that must be met for this estimation method to be applied.The latter three reasons encompass the benefits associated with this approach, as explained by [69,70].Firstly, this method aims to replicate a lag in the dependent variable, mainly when the outcome variable displays noticeable persistence.Secondly, the GMM approach fulfills the information condition required for this technique, given that there are more cross-sections than time series in each cross-section, and the N>T condition is met.Third, this study employed a methodology that combines an estimation technique, accounting for unchanging variables over time and simultaneity using instrumented regressors.This method effectively reduces potential endogeneity issues in all the studied variables.Additionally, the study considered differences among countries to make the findings more reliable.
The system GMM approach was also used to address biases associated with the different GMM strategies.Notably, the empirical GMM technique used in this study was adapted from the work by [71], representing a notable improvement over the approach.Roodman's method replaces initial differences with forward orthogonal deviations.The studies carried out by Asongu and Nwachukwu in 2017, emphasize the advantages of using an extended system GMM estimation method.This technique helps to control over-identification and reduce the use of too many instruments, which is beneficial.It's important to mention that the conventional method of GMM estimation can be understood through equations in levels (1) and first differences (2), where the variables of interest are treated as one lag non-contemporaneous when modeling the persistence of the outcome variables.
the term Cf i,t represents the capital flight of a specific country "i" during the period "t," and similarly, Cf i,t−τ (capital flight trap) indicates the capital flight of the same country "i" during the previous period "t" Furthermore, we grasp that Tr i,t−1 represents the terrorism within the country "i" (internal, transnational, unclear, and overall) during the time and σ 0 stands for a constant value.We value the set of control variables (trade openness, growth, exchange rate, and external debt), which is denoted as "W," while "i" signifies the effect specific to each country, "t" represents a constant specific to time, and "ε i,t " stands for the error term representing the coefficient of auto-regression.

Results and discussion
This section of the study presents a comprehensive depiction of the econometric outcomes.
The key constituents of the empirical findings comprising the graphic and econometric analyses are highlighted, with particular emphasis on the longitudinal data model encompassing a variety of estimation methodologies.

Results of panel unit root test
The initial presentation of the results obtained from utilizing the LLC unit root is documented in Table 2. Upon analysis, the unit root reveals that capital flight is stationary and at a certain level.However, it was observed that the variables of terrorism and corruption remain constant at I (1).Further, the control variables of trade openness, exchange rate, and foreign debt were stationary at I (1), while GDP and the interest rate were stationary at level.These outcomes have been accounted for in Table 2, utilizing the IPS and Fisher-ADF unit root.The results indicate that capital flight, interest rate, and GDP exhibit I (0) stationary behavior using the IPS and Fisher-ADF unit root in the integration sequence.Among the other variables, terrorism, corruption, foreign debt, trade openness, and exchange rate are stationary at I (1).

Effect of terrorism on capital flight.
The outcomes of the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) have been presented in Table 3 concerning the correlation between terrorism and capital flight.Based on empirical evidence, a positive and statistically significant association has been confirmed between capital flight and terrorism.This implies that the frequency of terrorist attacks is linked to higher levels of illegal capital flight, posing a comparable level of risk and harm to the nation as other sources.[72] has arrived at similar conclusions, stating that terrorist activities reduce the capital stock of economies, as individuals are less likely to reside and invest in unstable regions.The inquiry uncovers that terrorism has notably and favorably impacted the capital outflow.Furthermore, terrorism has also positively affected capital outflows in several other countries.Instances of terrorist incidents, like civil wars, that can trigger capital flight can substantially diminish the incoming capital into a nation.These terrorist events can result in adverse external effects on neighboring countries [35].Essentially, internal conflicts stemming from a terrorist attack in a bordering nation can decrease the capital inflow to those neighboring countries.Moreover, the degree of trade openness has demonstrated a substantial adverse effect on capital outflow.An economy's openness and freedom are fundamental prerequisites in trade and capital transfers.Foreign investors may be reluctant to engage in an economy burdened by substantial barriers and tariffs.Economic freedom establishes a conducive climate for investment by eliminating limitations on the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services, ultimately leading to increased profits for investors [62].These findings corroborate the prevailing economic hypothesis that higher financial freedom leads to heightened foreign direct investment flows.The outcomes of this investigation underscore that GDP has wielded a significant and adverse influence on capital outflow.Augmenting a country's GDP through infrastructure strengthening and expanding economic capacity paves the way for a more substantial inflow of foreign direct investment.Consequently, capital flight is facilitated by investment limitations.Furthermore, as investors avoid unpredictable and dangerous economic environments, the nation's financial circumstances are exposed to the threat of terrorism.However, the exchange rate and capital outflow interplay reveals a reciprocal and statistically insignificant relationship [73].The negative coefficient underscores the observation that the movement of capital outward is linked to the devaluation of the domestic currency in contrast to foreign currencies.Historically, individuals conducted transactions employing currencies with higher market valuation, converting their domestic currency into foreign currency to secure a more favorable yield.Confronting the volatility of exchange rates within local developing economies, investors can attain enhanced returns by allocating resources to alternative currencies within their nation.The allocation of resources into foreign currency bolsters the currency's strength vis-à-vis the domestic currency, thereby directly influencing the pace of expansion in import and export activities along with their associated magnitudes [24,74].
Conversely, individuals inclined towards embracing risks tend to leverage the volatile foreign exchange rates to enhance their profit potential through high-risk premiums.Consequently, it has been observed that despite employing foreign currencies, all investments are directed towards the local developing economy, negating foreign exchange rates' influence on capital flight.Therefore, the impact of currency rates on Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka lacks statistical significance.These results align with the investigations conducted by [75][76][77].
A weak and statistically insignificant linkage marks the connection between interest rates and capital flight.This observed phenomenon highlights a negative relationship between capital flight and interest rates, even though the overall association is minimal.This observation can be attributed to the fact that in times of inflation in emerging economies, financial institutions often provide higher interest rates on deposits, leading individuals to deposit their surplus funds in banks to earn better returns instead of investing in different sectors or foreign countries.Unlike capital flight, this behavior contributes to higher savings, ultimately bolstering economic credit [78,79].
The statistically insignificant relationship between trade openness and capital flight is evident.The direction of the coefficient for trade openness contradicts financial and economic theories that suggest a positive link between trade openness and capital flight.Interestingly, despite having open economies, countries like Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka exhibit a comparatively lower vulnerability to illicit capital flight.Moreover, encouraging trade openness fosters transparency, enhancing investor confidence in the economy's prospects [80].

Effect of corruption on capital flight.
The relationship between capital outflow and corruption, as revealed by the Generalized method of moment model (GMM), is detailed in Table 4. Through an empirical study across diverse South Asian countries, a statistically significant link has been established between corruption and capital outflows.This discovery underscores the prevalence of significant dishonest practices within local businesses, exemplified by bribery, receipt of kickbacks, and misallocating public funds in procurement activities.These elements have played a role in driving the unauthorized flow of capital out of specific countries, notably Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka.
Corruption, a pervasive issue in these nations, has shown itself to be intertwined with the phenomenon of capital flight.It signifies a worrisome erosion of transparency and trust within their economic frameworks.The results underscore the detrimental impact of corruption on financial stability and the overall well-being of these economies, calling for urgent measures to curb such practices and enhance investor confidence.The findings of this research corroborate the work of [28,37], which demonstrated the significant and positive impact of corruption on capital outflows.High levels of corruption are associated with an increase in capital flight.As a result, the results suggest that the average ratio of capital flight to GDP rises by approximately 1.9178 when public officials abuse their positions for personal gain.This implies that a more excellent perception of corruption among public authorities, including the bribery of public officials, kickbacks in public procurement, embezzlement of public funds, and other illegal activities, facilitates an increase in the unlawful outflow of capital from these countries.The findings validate the conclusions drawn by [28,81], who observed a positive and significant correlation between corruption and capital flight.The corruption coefficient of the comprehensive model suggests that a one-standard-deviation increase in corruption is associated with a million constant U.S. dollar rise in capital flight in selected countries.This outcome highlights the significant and severe threat of corruption to capital flight in South Asian countries.It also demonstrates that a decrease in the number of years since the most recent regime change or the conclusion of a transition period leads to reduced corruption and subsequently diminishes capital flight.This finding is consistent with the empirical results obtained by [82], who observed that more extended regime durability is linked to increased capital flight due to weaker governance, heightened corruption, and a less favorable domestic investment climate.Thus, it becomes evident that regime durability plays a crucial role in elucidating the impact of corruption on capital flight.However, the interaction between corruption and the rule of law and between corruption and the independence of the executive authority did not yield any statistically significant effects in the various specifications.
The GMM technique utilizes exchange rate, gross domestic product (GDP), and interest rate as instruments, while external debt trade openness serves as control variables.It's important to note that exchange and interest rates correlate negatively with capital flight, although this doesn't necessarily establish a cause-and-effect relationship.Similarly, the other control variables show an inverse link between economic growth and capital flight.The interaction between growth and capital flight centers on whether development is evenly spread or concentrated in specific regions, particularly those engaged in intensive extractive activities.In areas experiencing diverse economic growth, a positive perspective on investment prospects could potentially lower capital outflows.However, development centered on production may correlate with higher levels of capital flight [83].Conversely, the controlled macroeconomic variables in all specifications showed no statistically significant influence on capital flight, except for GDP, which also failed to exhibit the expected negative coefficient.This outcome suggests that the macroeconomic environment does not substantially impact capital flight in the designated countries.
The analysis demonstrates how various factors interplay with capital flight.Exchange and interest rates are connected, but this doesn't imply that one causes the other.Other variables, like economic growth and trade openness, also play a role in influencing capital flight.Moreover, the relationship between economic growth and capital flight is complex.If development is widespread, it might discourage capital flight.Conversely, when change is concentrated in specific sectors like resource extraction, it can trigger higher capital flight [84].This underscores the significance of considering multiple factors in understanding capital flight dynamics.

Conclusion
Within the existing body of scholarly work, a notable portion of research has been dedicated to scrutinizing the underlying causes and macroeconomic variables that wield sway over the phenomenon of capital flight.However, it is a regrettable circumstance that only a limited subset of inquiries has delved into the pivotal role played by terrorism and corruption as primary sources of instability within South Asian nations, notably including Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.Consequently, this study is fundamentally oriented towards a meticulous examination of the far-reaching consequences of terrorism and a comprehensive evaluation of corruption's impact on the intricate dynamics of capital flight within the context of South Asian countries.The analytical foundation of this investigation rests upon the established Portfolio Choice framework, underpinned by empirical evidence derived from the application of the Generalized Method of Moments.The data underpinning this analysis originates from a comprehensive collection spanning four key South Asian nations, covering the temporal spectrum from 1990 to 2019 (encompassing Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka).
The study's estimations reveal a substantial and statistically significant link between terrorism and the phenomenon of capital flight.In more detail, an escalation in illicit capital flight corresponds to a heightened occurrence of terrorist attacks.Additionally, the research has unveiled a robust and positive correlation between corruption and capital flight.This observation is consistent with the tenets of the Portfolio Choice theory, which posits that the relative risk-adjusted anticipated returns serve as a driver for capital flight.To simplify, the selected quartet of South Asian nations, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, exhibit elevated corruption levels, exacerbating capital outflow.
The outcomes of the present inquiry validate those documented in preceding scholarly works.Nonetheless, the macroeconomic factors subjected to analysis within this study, namely, the interest rate, exchange rate, GDP, and trade openness, do not consistently manifest the expected directional patterns and are ascribed to limited statistical significance.Grounded on these discerned results, the deduction drawn is that select South Asian nations undergo an upsurge in capital outflows due to the interplay of terrorism, corruption, and deficiencies in institutional governance.

Policy implications
Examining capital flight in South Asian countries through the lens of terrorism and corruption carries significant policy implications.Here are some considerations:

Strengthening Anti-Corruption Measures:
i. Transparency and Accountability: Implementing robust anti-corruption measures is crucial.Transparency in financial transactions and governance could help reduce the opportunities for corrupt practices that lead to capital flight.
ii. Legal Reforms: Enhancing legal frameworks to prosecute corrupt practices is vital.
Strengthening laws and their enforcement can act as a deterrent.

Counterterrorism Strategies:
i. Financial Monitoring and Regulation: Implementing stricter financial monitoring and regulation to prevent funds from being diverted to terrorist activities.This involves enhancing collaboration between financial institutions and law enforcement to track suspicious transactions.
ii.International Cooperation: Engaging in cross-border cooperation to curb terrorism financing.Collaborating with international bodies and neighboring nations is essential to control the flow of funds that support terrorism.

Economic Policies:
i. Encouraging Investment: Creating an environment conducive to investment by improving business conditions and reducing bureaucratic hurdles.A stable and favorable investment climate might deter capital flight.
ii. Promoting Economic Diversification: Diversifying economies beyond traditional sectors susceptible to corruption and terrorism could reduce the impact of these issues on capital flight.

Diplomatic and Regional Collaboration:
i. Regional Cooperation: Encouraging cooperation among South Asian countries to address these issues collectively.Regional collaborations could help in standardizing anti-corruption measures and counterterrorism strategies.
ii. Diplomatic Engagement: Strengthening diplomatic ties with other nations and international organizations could aid in receiving support and expertise to combat these issues effectively.

Capacity Building and Awareness:
i. Institutional Capacity Building: Enhancing institutions' capacity to tackle corruption and terrorism financing.This involves training and providing resources to address these challenges effectively.
ii. Public Awareness: Educating the public about the detrimental effects of corruption and terrorism on the economy and society, encouraging collective efforts to combat these issues.

Limitations and future research direction
Investigating the phenomenon of capital flight in South Asian nations within the framework of terrorism and corruption constitutes a pivotal field of investigation, necessitating the scrutiny of numerous constraints.The potential for future research resides in addressing these limitations to gain a more profound understanding of the complexities surrounding these matters, thereby offering policymakers and scholars a wider range of comprehensive insights.Some critical limitations and future recommendations are the following: 5.3.1 Limitations.
i. Data Availability and Quality: A significant limitation in investigating capital flight, terrorism, and corruption in South Asian countries is data availability and quality.Some nations may lack transparency or comprehensive reporting on these issues, making it challenging to conduct a thorough analysis.
ii. Methodological Challenges: Quantifying the impact of terrorism and corruption on capital flight is methodologically intricate.Researchers may face difficulties determining the precise magnitude of these factors' influence on capital flight.
iii.Diverse Contexts: South Asian countries vary significantly in political, economic, and social contexts.The study might struggle to capture this diversity adequately and need to generalize its findings to apply to the entire region.

Future research opportunities.
i. Micro-Level Analysis: While this study focuses on the macro-level impact, future research could explore the micro-level factors and mechanisms that drive capital flight within specific industries or sectors in South Asian countries.
ii. Impact on Economic Growth: Research that quantifies the impact of capital flight driven by terrorism and corruption on the economic growth and development of South Asian countries can be a valuable avenue for future investigation.
iii.External Factors: Future research could explore the role of external factors, such as international sanctions, global financial regulations, and foreign aid, in shaping the dynamics of capital flight in South Asian countries.
iv. Policy Interventions: Investigating the effectiveness of policy interventions to mitigate capital flight in the context of terrorism and corruption would be a significant area of research -understanding which policies work and which do not can inform better governance strategies.